JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 25, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala de Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-025/04 coloca a disposición de varias entidades los CD que contienen informes presentados por el Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, la Policía Nacional, la Vicepresidencia de la República, la Unidad Nacional de Protección y la Presidencia de la República, en cumplimiento del Auto 620/17.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la suscrita Magistrada,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. PONER A DISPOSICION de la Procuraduria General de la Nacion, Defensoria del Pueblo, la Contraloria General de la Republica, las personerias municipales de El Charco, La Tola, Olaya Herrera (Satinga), Santa Barbara de Iscuande, Mosquera, Barbacoas, Magui Payan, Roberto Payan, Francisco Pizarro y Tumaco, la Oficina del Alto Comisionado de Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados, al Consejo Noruego para los Refugiados y a la Comision de Seguimiento a la Politica Publica sobre Desplazamiento Forzado, en la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional y durante el termino de quince (15) dias el CD que contiene los informes relacionados en el cuadro de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

This decision has no citations or indexed topics in the Court's graph yet.